Open thread for those of an unmoderating dispostion

[Alan Fox]

Let's test a claim by Sal Cordova!

I read in another venue that the commenter Thorton was no longer able to post at all at this site. Sal says not so; s/he's only "uninvited" from the threads s/he has participated in due to rule violations and can post in other threads where the thread author sets the rules.

Right! My rules are, other than spam, porn, defamation and false advertising claims, there are no rules.

I'll give Thorton a headsup and see if s/he can post here.

And no need to point out I'm a liar for saying my previous comment on this site was my last one. Sal's response changed the situation. If Thorton is not actually blocked from logging in and can do so, I'll continue to participate where time permits and interest persists.

PS @ Sal

I don't hate you, Sal. I told you before, you are the reason I developed an interest in the ID movement. I'm even more fascinated now you've emerged from the Creationist closet.

[stcordova]

[stcordova]

[Rich]

LOL@Creationist message control. This is already going the way of "Young Cosmos".

http://badidea.wordpress.com/2007/12/27 ... -salesman/

http://badidea.wordpress.com/2007/12/28 ... into-cows/

http://stlouisskepticalsociety.blogspot ... rdova.html

http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2013/07/th ... rdova.html

http://www.sunclipse.org/?p=461

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ik ... 44&p=69528

[Tragic Mishap]

Curious, does this mean that if Thorton doesn't post Alan's hypothesis is proved correct?

Interesting mode of reasoning, although the point appears moot.

[Rich]

Typical Sal:

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ik ... ntry233367

[DiEb]

[stcordova]

[Alan Fox]

Well let me know if you decide to clean up your act, Sal. Until that happens (which I don't expect any time soon going on previous experience) I see no future in further attempts at dialogue.