John Sanford granted a rare public interview on the last day of the 8th International Conference on Creationism (ICC), July 31, 2018 – August 1, 2018.
He said while he was in high school, “evolution theory…destroyed the budding faith that I had.” But then he found the Lord decades later, and then 10 years after his conversion to Christianity, he became a creationist.
Cornell Research professor Dr. Sanford is a legendary geneticist and his invention, the Gene Gun is responsible for creating a sizable fraction of all the genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on Planet Earth. For his accomplishments his work was featured in the Smithsonian National Museum of American History. This is a picture of the young John Sanford and his Gene Gun.
[for new students of creation science and intelligent design]
Perhaps the strongest argument against the existence of God and against His Intelligent Design of the universe is the fact the world is a real mess. The argument goes something like this:
Someone so smart and capable as God wouldn’t make broken things like this world, therefore since the world is obviously full of suffering and broken things, there is no God.
This is known as the “bad design argument”
Before answering the problem of “bad design” directly, consider whether humans will deliberately design things have some bad built in. Would a human ever do that? If the answer is yes, then it becomes possible to believe that God would also deliberately design things that have some bad in them to achieve an ulitmate good.
If you were designing a game — a sports game, a video game, a card game, etc. — would you design it so that there would be no chance of losing, no chance of having low scores? Would you design a game where people will always be winners? Would you want to play such a game? Would the NFL Superbowl have any meaning if all teams were winners at the end of the season? Would you want to play a video game where every time you played you were guaranteed the highest possible score?
How about a drama, a movie, a play, a novel? Would the characters never face difficulties or challenges? If a story said something like
Chapter 1: Once upon a time every one was happy….
Chapter 2: everyone is still happy, and they stayed happy….
Chapter 75: everyone is still happy, they were always happy and they lived happily ever after.
Would that be a compelling story that you’d watch or read? Would that be the sort of movie you’d wait in line for? Probably not.
Thus, a little bad can be very important for creating ultimate good.
If we need a little bad in order to write great stories of fiction, how much more does it make sense that there is a little bad in this world to make the final chapters of reality all the more beautiful.
If we view God as the great novelist in the sky, these present troubles are only the early chapters in the greatest story every told. The present sorrows will have meaning if the story of creation has a happy ending. The present sorrows will make the happy ending that much more meaningful.
From 2 Cor 4:17, New Century Version
We have small troubles for a while now, but they are helping us gain an eternal glory that is much greater than the troubles.
From 2 Cor 4:17, English Standard Version
For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison,
NOTES
Advanced Topics exploring answers to the bad design argument.
When I watched the Ken Ham vs. Bill Nye debate, I lamented, “Why Lord don’t we have someone of the stature and reputation of Isaac Newton today to defend your creation?” In years gone by Christians were at the forefront of intellectual advancement in science, technology, medicine, literature, art, music, etc. I lamented, “dear Lord, why has this happened? Why do you defend your Word and the testimony of your creation this way? Wouldn’t the world be inclined to believe if you raised up someone who was as respected as Newton to defend creation in the present day?”
Some of the greatest scientists who have ever lived including Newton, who may have been the greatest of all believed in God. But it was hard to be an atheist before Darwin: the illusion [sic] of living design is so overwhelming.
